Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
teis_a_1402371_sm9188.pdf (268.88 kB)

A systematic mapping study of process mining

Download (268.88 kB)
Version 2 2017-11-25, 05:28
Version 1 2017-11-21, 02:53
journal contribution
posted on 2017-11-25, 05:28 authored by Ana Rocío Cárdenas Maita, Lucas Corrêa Martins, Carlos Ramón López Paz, Laura Rafferty, Patrick C. K. Hung, Sarajane Marques Peres, Marcelo Fantinato

This study systematically assesses the process mining scenario from 2005 to 2014. The analysis of 705 papers evidenced ‘discovery’ (71%) as the main type of process mining addressed and ‘categorical prediction’ (25%) as the main mining task solved. The most applied traditional technique is the ‘graph structure-based’ ones (38%). Specifically concerning computational intelligence and machine learning techniques, we concluded that little relevance has been given to them. The most applied are ‘evolutionary computation’ (9%) and ‘decision tree’ (6%), respectively. Process mining challenges, such as balancing among robustness, simplicity, accuracy and generalization, could benefit from a larger use of such techniques.

Funding

This work was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes), Brazil; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp), Brazil [2013/17520-7].

History