Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
plcp_a_1590609_sm4630.docx (137.96 kB)

Conversational expectations get revised as response latencies unfold

Download (137.96 kB)
Version 2 2020-04-22, 13:34
Version 1 2019-03-14, 16:38
journal contribution
posted on 2020-04-22, 13:34 authored by Sara Bögels, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson

The present study extends neuro-imaging into conversation through studying dialogue comprehension. Conversation entails rapid responses, with negative semiotics for delay. We explored how expectations about the valence of the forthcoming response develop during the silence before the response and whether negative responses have mainly cognitive or social-emotional consequences. EEG-participants listened to questions from a spontaneous spoken corpus, cross-spliced with short/long gaps and “yes”/“no” responses. Preceding contexts biased listeners to expect the eventual response, which was hypothesised to translate to expectations for a shorter or longer gap. “No” responses showed a trend towards an early positivity, suggesting socio-emotional consequences. Within the long gap, expecting a “yes” response led to an earlier negativity, as well as a trend towards stronger theta-oscillations, after 300 milliseconds. This suggests that listeners anticipate/predict “yes” responses to come earlier than “no” responses, showing strong sensitivities to timing, which presumably promote hastening the pace of verbal interaction.

Funding

This work was supported by the European Research Council under an advanced [grant number 269484 INTERACT].

History

Usage metrics

    Language Cognition and Neuroscience

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC