Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
icdv_a_1699248_sm8682.docx (30.68 kB)

Diagnostic accuracy of troponin T measured ≥6h after symptom onset for ruling out myocardial infarction

Download (30.68 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-12-09, 12:32 authored by Ardavan Khoshnood, Marie Erlandsson, Nazim Isma, Troels Yndigegn, Arash Mokhtari

Objectives: Guidelines recommend a single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) ≤14 ng/L measured ≥6 h after chest pain onset combined with a GRACE score <140 and the patient being pain-free for ruling out myocardial infarction (MI). There is however little data on the performance of this strategy. We therefore aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a hs-cTnT ≤14 ng/L measured ≥6 h after chest pain onset when combined with GRACE score or other clinical risk stratification tools. Design: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study, which enrolled emergency department (ED) chest pain patients. The hs-cTnT strategy was combined with HEART, TIMI, EDACS, GRACE score and ED physician’s overall assessment of patient history and ECG. The primary outcome was MI, and the secondary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Results: All tested diagnostic strategies were shown to have a negative predictive value (NPV) ≥99.5% for ruling out MI. Using HEART, TIMI, EDACS or ECG + patient history also resulted in a NPV ≥98% for ruling out 30-day MACE. An isolated hs-cTnT ≤14 ng/L measured ≥6 h after chest pain onset and the combination with GRACE score both had a NPV <98% for ruling out 30-day MACE. Conclusion: A single hs-cTnT ≤14 ng/L obtained ≥6 h from chest pain onset, with and without GRACE score, reliably ruled out MI but did not perform well for ruling out 30-day MACE. These results question current guideline recommendations, and indicate that HEART, EDACS, TIMI, or ECG + patient history strategies should be the preferred risk stratification tools.

Funding

The study was supported by an ALF research grant at Skåne University Hospital and by a grant from Region Skåne. These are grants from the Swedish government and the regional council. There was no industry involvement. Funding organizations had no role in the planning, design, or conduct of the study, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, or preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.

History