Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
fwep_a_1668245_sm5426.pdf (208.56 kB)

How governments strategically time welfare state reform legislation: empirical evidence from five European countries

Download (208.56 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-10-04, 14:21 authored by Georg Wenzelburger, Carsten Jensen, Seonghui Lee, Christoph Arndt

Building on studies on the political business cycle, the literature on welfare state retrenchment has argued that governments which cut the welfare state try to avoid blame by implementing painful measures in the beginning of the mandate and expanding benefits as elections approach. In contrast to this linear relationship, this article argues that governments often feel pressured to fulfil (mostly expansionary) campaign promises during the first months in office. Consequently, cutting right away is not what should be expected. Instead, a more nuanced, U-shaped timing trajectory is probable with a period in the beginning characterised by both cuts and fulfilment of expansionary pledges, followed by a period of cutbacks, and finally an expansive phase towards the end of a mandate. This argument is tested on our new original dataset of legislative changes in five European countries – Britain, Denmark, Finland, France and Germany – during the last four decades.

Funding

The project has been generously supported by the Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant no. 4003-00013).

History

Usage metrics

    West European Politics

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC