Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
usnr_a_1703062_sm5606.docx (59.64 kB)

Institutional Diversity in the Planning Process Yields Similar Outcomes for Vegetation in Ecological Restoration

Download (59.64 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-12-24, 14:36 authored by Liam Heneghan, Lynne M. Westphal, Kristen A. Ross, Cristy Watkins, Paul H. Gobster, Basil V. Iannone, Madeleine Tudor, Joanne Vining, Alaka Wali, Moira Zellner, David H. Wise

Conservation organizations undertaking ecological restoration and the lands they manage constitute a social-ecological system (SES). We implemented SES analysis to examine the relationship between diversity in organizational structure and restoration planning processes, and vegetation outcomes on the ground. Understanding the restoration consequences of multiple approaches to planning and implementation is relevant to assessing the resilience of this SES, especially if disagreements about the effectiveness of some approaches lead to conflict in the socio-political arena. We studied 10 conservation organizations in the Chicago Wilderness region that are restoring Midwestern oak woodlands of global conservation concern. Despite the institutional diversity of these organizations, we found little relationship between restoration planning and vegetation outcomes. This result has implications for the resilience of restoration as an SES, since similar outcomes from diverse processes should increase resilience of this SES, especially when controversial restoration practices are employed, and when priorities and funding levels change.

Funding

This research was supported in part by NSF grant numbers DEB-BE-0909043, 0909451, 0909293 and 0909424: Collaborative Research: Coupled Natural Human Systems in the Chicago Wilderness: Evaluating the Biodiversity and Social Outcomes of Different Models of Restoration Planning.

History