Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
1/1
2 files

Polychlorinated biphenyl exposure and DNA methylation in the Anniston Community Health Survey

dataset
posted on 2019-10-14, 07:01 authored by Gary S. Pittman, Xuting Wang, Michelle R. Campbell, Sherry J. Coulter, James R. Olson, Marian Pavuk, Linda S. Birnbaum, Douglas A. Bell

Anniston, Alabama was home to a major polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) production facility from 1929 until 1971. The Anniston Community Health Survey I and II (ACHS-I 2005–2007, ACHS-II 2013–2014) were conducted to explore the effects of PCB exposures. In this report we examined associations between PCB exposure and DNA methylation in whole blood using EPIC arrays (ACHS-I, n = 518; ACHS-II, n = 299). For both cohorts, 35 PCBs were measured in serum. We modelled methylation versus PCB wet-weight concentrations for: the sum of 35 PCBs, mono-ortho substituted PCBs, di-ortho substituted PCBs, tri/tetra-ortho substituted PCBs, oestrogenic PCBs, and antiestrogenic PCBs. Using robust multivariable linear regression, we adjusted for age, race, sex, smoking, total lipids, and six blood cell-type percentages. We carried out a two-stage analysis; discovery in ACHS-I followed by replication in ACHS-II. In ACHS-I, we identified 28 associations (17 unique CpGs) at p ≤ 6.70E-08 and 369 associations (286 unique CpGs) at FDR p ≤ 5.00E-02. A large proportion of the genes have been observed to interact with PCBs or dioxins in model studies. Among the 28 genome-wide significant CpG/PCB associations, 14 displayed replicated directional effects in ACHS-II; however, only one in ACHS-II was statistically significant at p ≤ 1.70E-04. While we identified many novel CpGs significantly associated with PCB exposures in ACHS-I, the differential methylation was modest and the effect was attenuated seven years later in ACHS-II, suggesting a lack of persistence of the associations between PCB exposures and altered DNA methylation in blood cells.

Funding

The baseline study (ACHS-I) was conducted using a grant from ATSDR to Jacksonville State University, #5U50TS473215. The follow up study (ACHS-II) was funded by the National Cancer Institute-National Institutes of Health through interagency agreements with the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (IAA#: 11-AT1-001-00; IAA#: 12-AT-12-ANNISTON) and by ATSDR. Data collection was supported via contract from ATSDR to the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) (CDC Contract No. 200-2011-40834). Research was also supported by an appointment to the Research Participation Program at the CDC administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. In addition, this study was funded in part by the Intramural Research Programs of the National Institute of Environmental Health Science-National Institutes of Health, USA (Z01-ES-100475) and by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA (Z1-ABC-011456). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent ATSDR/CDC official views; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry [#5U50TS473215]; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [Z01-ES-100475]; National Cancer Institute (US) [Z01-ABC-011456].

History