Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
1/1
3 files

Costs and risks associated with surveying the extent of herbicide resistance in New Zealand

dataset
posted on 2019-07-08, 23:34 authored by Christopher E. Buddenhagen, Matilda Gunnarsson, Phil Rolston, Richard J. Chynoweth, Graeme Bourdot, Trevor K. James

Herbicide resistance has repeatedly developed under intensive herbicidal weed management regimes globally with 255 species having resistant biotypes. In New Zealand, since 1979, resistance was found in 13 taxa, with >25 herbicides in 8 chemical classes showing reduced effectiveness (i.e. HRAC groups A, B, C, D, F, G, H, N and O). Cases included weeds in turf, pastures, orchards, vineyards, forage and arable crops. Surprisingly little is known about the spatial extent or frequency of this problem in New Zealand. We estimate that 14,000 farms have land-use histories like those favouring herbicide resistance historically. Sampling simulations of ≥10% farms provided good estimates of resistance prevalence for most regions and crop types. Acceptable sampling rates varied with target population size, actual resistance prevalence, and detection certainty. Our simulations provide a sobering caution regarding our ability to delimit the problem cheaply or accurately. Detection rates lower than 75% always give imprecise prevalence estimates. Sampling and screening involved 7.4 h labour and 27 km of travel costing $759 NZD per farm. Sampling 10% of farms would cost >$1 million NZD if lower risk farms were excluded, or >$3 million in exhaustive surveys. Regional farm and industry breakdowns could guide cost-sharing arrangements for surveys.

Funding

This work was supported by Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [grant number C10X1806] to AgResearch: Improved weed control and vegetation management to minimise future herbicide resistance.

History

Usage metrics

    New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC