Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
DOCUMENT
ntcn_a_2047789_sm0971.docx (131.57 kB)
DOCUMENT
ntcn_a_2047789_sm0970.docx (13.2 kB)
1/0
2 files

Examination of the validity of the ‘Papadum test’: An alternative to the clock drawing test for people with low levels of education

Version 2 2023-06-21, 21:40
Version 1 2022-03-23, 08:40
dataset
posted on 2023-06-21, 21:40 authored by Mairi Crombie, Aparna Dutt, Priyanka Dey, Ranita Nandi, Jonathan Evans

Objectives: The clock drawing test (CDT) is a widely used cognitive screening test. However, CDT performance is affected by education. This study examined an alternative, the Papadum test, designed for people with low levels of education/literacy. The association between education and test performance, correlation between CDT and Papadum test, and diagnostic accuracy of both CDT and Papadum tests were examined. Method: 89 healthy literate adults and 59 literate adults (all Bengali speaking) with a diagnosis of mild-moderate dementia from hospitals in Kolkata, India undertook the CDT and the Papadum test. Results: Education had a significant association with the CDT but not with the Papadum test. Across the whole sample there was a significant correlation between CDT and Papadum, but not within separate groups of healthy controls and patients. Diagnostic accuracy for the Papadum test was similar to that for CDT. Conclusions: Results highlight the strong influence that education has on CDT performance indicating that it is not suitable for those with low levels of literacy. The Papadum test could provide a viable alternative as a screening tool to the CDT for use with people who are illiterate or have low levels of education. Further validation studies are required.

History

Usage metrics

    The Clinical Neuropsychologist

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC