posted on 2021-08-16, 08:40authored byViiu Paalme, Mart Speek
<div>
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Supplementary Fig. 1
Detection of denatured DNA in commercial pDNA minipreps. (A) Bgl II digestion
of pmaxGFP prepared by using four commercial kits (for manufacturers’ details
see Table 1) and fractional precipitation method (FPI, this study). (B)
Similar Hind III digestion of pB1AS. All plasmids were incubated with (+) and
without (−) the restriction enzyme at 37oC for 1 hr and thereafter analysed
by agarose gel electrophoresis. Tris-borate-EDTA (pH 8.3) 0.6% agarose gels,
containing 0.1 µg/ml ethidium bromide, were run at low voltage (6 V/cm) for 2
hrs. Electrophoregrams showing different plasmid forms [8, 15]: OC - open
circular, L - linear, CCC - covalently closed circular and D - denatured,
marked on the right of panels. Note the presence of dpDNA in PureYield
miniprep in both panels and QIAprep Spin in panel B. M - 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder
(Invitrogen).</p>
<p>Supplementary Fig. 2
Detection of RNase contamination in commercial pDNA minipreps. (A) Three
hundred nanograms of pmaxGFP, prepared by using four commercial kits (for
manufacturers’ details see Table 1) and fractional precipitation method (FPI,
this study), were incubated with 1.5 µg of NTera2D1 total RNA in a 5 µl
volume at 37oC for 1 hr and thereafter analysed by agarose gel
electrophoresis. (B) Similar incubation and analysis was performed for pB1AS.
Tris-borate-EDTA (pH 8.3) 1.0% agarose gels, containing 0.1 µg/ml ethidium
bromide, were run at 5 V/cm for 1 hr. Note the RNA degradation on lanes
GeneJET and QIAprep Spin in both panels. M - 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder
(Invitrogen).</p>
<p>Supplementary Fig. 3
Determination of the endotoxin content in pmaxGFP minipreps. The endotoxin
content in plasmid minipreps was measured with LAL Chromogenic Endotoxin
Quantitation Kit (Thermo Scientific Pierce). Two series of measurements of
the same plasmid samples were initially carried out independently in parallel
by two researchers and only those results were considered matching or
reproducible which showed less than 2-fold difference. Standard curve (first
graph) was prepared by using Escherichia coli (E. coli) Endotoxin Standard
(011:B4) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Manufacturers’ names of
the miniprep kits (on top of each graph) are listed Table 1. For each
plasmid, including the one prepared by fractional precipitation method (FPI,
this study), endotoxin units (EU) per microgram of pDNA (boxed below the
graph), were calculated by using the graph’s equation.</p>
<p>Supplementary Fig. 4
Determination of the endotoxin content in pB1AS minipreps. The endotoxin
content in plasmid minipreps was measured with LAL Chromogenic Endotoxin
Quantitation Kit (Thermo Scientific Pierce). Two series of measurements of
the same plasmid samples were initially carried out independently in parallel
by two researchers and only those results were considered matching or
reproducible which showed less than 2-fold difference. Standard curve (first
graph) was prepared by using Escherichia coli (E. coli) Endotoxin Standard
(011:B4) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For manufacturers’ names
of the miniprep kits (listed on top of each graph) see Table 1. For each
plasmid, including the one prepared by differential precipitation method
(FPI, this study), endotoxin units (EU) per microgram of pDNA (boxed below
the graph), were calculated by using the graph’s equation.</p>
<p>Supplementary Fig. 5
Comparison of the transfection efficiency of different pmaxGFP minipreps. (A)
Representative examples of the transfected Huh7 cells recorded by
fluorescence microscopy. These micrographs were converted to binary images (shown
below) and analysed for particles with ImageJ [16]. Transfection details:
plasmids were prepared with commercial kits (manufacturers names shown on
top; FPI, this study), One microgram of each plasmid was transfected into
Huh7 cells in 12 well plate format using Lipofectamine 3000 Reagent according
to manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All transfections were
made in triplicate. (B) Analysis of transfection efficiency of different
plasmids prepared with commercial kits. Corresponding manufacturers’ names
are listed on panel a. Data shown are the mean ± s.d.</p>
<p>Supplementary Fig. 6
Comparison of the transfection efficiency of different pB1AS minipreps. One
microgram of each plasmid, prepared with a commercial kit (for manufacturers’
names see Table ; FPI, this study), was cotransfected with 10 ng of pRL into
HEK293 cells in 12 well plate format using Lipofectamine 3000 Reagent
according to manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All
transfections were made in triplicate. Firefly luciferase (pB1AS) and Renilla
luciferase (pRL) activities were determined by using Dual-Glo Luciferase
Assay System (Promega). Relative firefly luciferase activity normalized to
Renilla luciferase is shown. Data shown are the mean ± s.d.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Supplementary Fig. 7 Characterization of the
cell viability determined after transfection of different pmaxGFP minipreps.
Five hundred nanograms of pmaxGFP, prepared with commercial kits (manufacturers
names are listed in Table 1; FPI, this study), were transfected into HEK293 (A)
and Huh7 cells (B) in three independent experiments. Cell viability was
measured 48 hrs after transfection using CellTiter-Glo 2.0 Assay according to
the manufacturer’s protocol (Promega). Data shown are the mean ± s.d.
Funding
Partially supported by a grant from the Estonian Research Council (PUT1221).