Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
taos_a_1733388_sm5244.pdf (635.81 kB)

Comparisons of the effects of different drying methods on soil nitrogen fractions: Insights into emissions of reactive nitrogen gases (HONO and NO)

Download (635.81 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-03-03, 04:23 authored by Dianming WU, Lingling DENG, Yanzhuo LIU, Di XI, Huilan ZOU, Ruhai WANG, Zhimin SHA, Yuepeng PAN, Lijun HOU, Min LIU

Reactive nitrogen (Nr) emission from soils, e.g., nitrous acid (HONO) and nitric oxide (NO), is a key process of the global nitrogen (N) cycle and has significant implications for atmospheric chemistry. To understand the underlying mechanisms of soil Nr emissions, air-dried or oven-dried soils are commonly used in the laboratory. To date, few studies have compared the effects of different drying methods on soil Nr gas fluxes and N fractions. Here, the authors studied soil water content, pH, (in)organic N content, and Nr gas fluxes of air-dried, freeze-dried, oven-dried, and fresh soils from different land-use types. The results showed that the soil pH of air-dried and oven-dried samples was significantly lower compared with fresh soil from farmland and grassland, but higher compared with forest soil. The difference in soil pH between freeze-dried and fresh soil (mean ± standard deviation: 0.52 ± 0.31) was the lowest. In general, all drying methods increased the soil NH4+-N, NO3-N, and dissolved organic N contents compared with fresh soil (P < 0.05). The maximum HONO and NO flux and total emissions during a full wetting–drying cycle of fresh soil were also increased by air-drying and oven-drying (P < 0.001), but comparable with freeze-dried soil (P > 0.2). In conclusion, all drying methods should be considered for use in studies on the land–atmosphere interface and biogeochemical N cycling, whereas the freeze-drying method might be better for studies involving the measurement of soil Nr gas fluxes.

Funding

This work was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 41807449, 41761144062, and 41730646], the Shanghai Pujiang Program [grant number 18PJ1403500], and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

History