Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
iaac_a_1692902_sm1692.doc (310 kB)

Determining a Zulu core vocabulary for children who use augmentative and alternative communication

Download (310 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-12-14, 04:58 authored by Jocelyn Mngomezulu, Kerstin M. Tönsing, Shakila Dada, Nomadlozi B. Bokaba

Vocabulary selection is an important aspect to consider when designing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems for children who have not yet developed conventional literacy skills. AAC team members have used core vocabulary lists (representing words most commonly and frequently used by speakers of a natural language) as a resource to assist in this process. To date, there are no core vocabulary lists for Zulu. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the vocabulary most frequently and commonly used by Zulu-speaking preschool children, in order to inform vocabulary selection for peers who use AAC. Communication samples from 6 Zulu-speaking participants without disabilities were collected during regular preschool activities. Analyses were conducted both by orthographic words and by morphological analysis of formatives. Due to the linguistic and orthographic structure of Zulu, an analysis by formatives was found to be more useful to determine a core vocabulary. The number of different formatives used, frequency of use, and commonality of use among the participants were identified. A total of 213 core formatives were identified; core formatives related to language structure were used more frequently than those that related to lexical content. The characteristics of this Zulu core vocabulary were consistent with those of core vocabularies established in other languages. Implications for the design of Zulu AAC systems are discussed.

Funding

This study was based on a Master’s thesis completed by the first author under supervision of the second and third authors. The financial assistance of the Oppenheimer Memorial Trust (OMT) and the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa [grant no. TTK150617119597] towards this research is herewith acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at are those of the authors and are not necessarily to be attributed to the OMT or the NRF.

History

Usage metrics

    Augmentative & Alternative Communication

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC