Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
hsem_a_1850289_sm6179.docx (91.3 MB)

Is Item Imputation Always Better? An Investigation of Wave-Missing Data in Growth Models

Download (91.3 MB)
Version 2 2021-07-09, 13:41
Version 1 2021-01-25, 21:20
journal contribution
posted on 2021-07-09, 13:41 authored by Juan Diego Vera, Craig K. Enders

Questionnaire data present challenges, as a missing item of a multi-item scale would lead to a total missing scale. A researcher applying multiple imputation to an incomplete multi-item questionnaire can impute the incomplete items prior to computing scale scores or impute the scale score entirely. Methodologist have favored item-level imputation because it greatly enhances precision in comparison to scale-level imputation; however, this benefit in precision might not translate into longitudinal data studies where entire questionnaire batteries are missing. We investigated the performance of item- and scale-level imputation model and found that item-level imputation did not produce a precision advantage in estimating any of the growth model parameters and scale-level showed better precision in estimating the slope variance parameter than item-level imputation.

Funding

This work was supported by Institute of Educational Sciences award [R305D150056].

History

Usage metrics

    Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC