Taylor & Francis Group
Browse

Preferences of people with diabetes for diabetes care in Germany: a discrete choice experiment

Download (92.05 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-21, 14:00 authored by Markus Vomhof, Anna C. Boersma, Dorijn F. L. Hertroijs, Matthias Kaltheuner, Michael Krichbaum, Bernhard Kulzer, Andrea Icks, Mickael Hiligsmann

The objective of this study is to elicit health care preferences of people with diabetes and identify classes of people with different preferences.

A discrete choice experiment was conducted among people with diabetes in Germany comprising attributes of role division in daily diabetes care planning, type of lifestyle education, support for correct medication intake, consultation frequency, emotional support, and time spent on self-management. A conditional logit model and a latent class model were used to elicit preferences toward diabetes care and analyze preference heterogeneity.

A total of 76 people with diabetes, recruited in two specialized diabetes care centers in Germany (mean age 51.9 years, 37.3% women, 49.1% type 2 diabetes mellitus, 50.9% type 1 diabetes mellitus), completed the discrete choice experiment. The most important attributes were consultation frequency, division in daily diabetes care planning, and correct medication intake. The latent class model detected preference heterogeneity by identifying two latent classes which differ mainly with respect to lifestyle education and medication intake.

While the majority of people with diabetes showed preferences in line with current health care provision in Germany, a relevant subgroup wished to strengthen lifestyle education and medication intake support with an aid or website.

Funding

The study was supported by institutional funding (German Diabetes Center) of the Federal Ministry of Health and by the Ministry of Culture and Science of North Rhine-Westphalia. It was further funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research as part of the German Center for Diabetes Research. The study sponsor/funder was not involved in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing the report; and did not impose any restrictions regarding the publication of the report.

History