Taylor & Francis Group
Browse
thsj_a_1767782_sm6013.pdf (781.36 kB)

Uncertainty assessment in river flow projections for Ethiopia’s Upper Awash Basin using multiple GCMs and hydrological models

Download (781.36 kB)
Version 2 2020-08-24, 10:50
Version 1 2020-05-13, 16:31
journal contribution
posted on 2020-08-24, 10:50 authored by Wilson C. H. Chan, Julian R. Thompson, Richard G. Taylor, Alistair E. Nay, Tenalem Ayenew, Alan M. MacDonald, Martin C. Todd

Uncertainty in climate change impacts on river discharge in the Upper Awash Basin, Ethiopia, is assessed using five MIKE SHE hydrological models, six CMIP5 general circulation models (GCMs) and two representative concentration pathways (RCP) scenarios for the period 2071–2100. Hydrological models vary in their spatial distribution and process representations of unsaturated and saturated zones. Very good performance is achieved for 1975–1999 (NSE: 0.65–0.8; r: 0.79–0.93). GCM-related uncertainty dominates variability in projections of high and mean discharges (mean: –34% to +55% for RCP4.5, – 2% to +195% for RCP8.5). Although GCMs dominate uncertainty in projected low flows, inter-hydrological model uncertainty is considerable (RCP4.5: –60% to +228%, RCP8.5: –86% to +337%). Analysis of variance uncertainty attribution reveals that GCM-related uncertainty occupies, on average, 68% of total uncertainty for median and high flows and hydrological models no more than 1%. For low flows, hydrological model uncertainty occupies, on average, 18% of total uncertainty; GCM-related uncertainty remains substantial (average: 28%).

Funding

This study was supported by a consortium grant, GroFutures [grant refs: NE/M008932/1, NE/M008584/1, NE/M008207/1] funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the UK Department for International Development (DfID): Unlocking the Potential of Groundwater for Poverty Alleviation (UPGro) consortium project.

History