Taylor & Francis Group
Browse

An overview of global CME/CPD systems

Version 2 2024-07-22, 06:40
Version 1 2024-07-16, 12:20
dataset
posted on 2024-07-22, 06:40 authored by Lawrence Sherman, Samar Aboulsoud, Ricardo Leon-Borquez, Kuang Ming, Da-Ya David Yang, Kathy Chappell

Engagement in CME/CPD has a positive impact on healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) knowledge, skills, and performance, and on patient outcomes, therefore it is critical to better understand the components of CME/CPD systems that foster engagement, high-quality education, and impact.

An assessment of CME/CPD systems was conducted using a mixed-methods approach that included interviews with in-country subject matter experts and qualitative and quantitative data from practicing in-country physicians.

Results demonstrate areas of consistency in CME/CPD systems across world regions that included: types of educational providers; types of credit; educational formats; self-tracking of participation; high-degree of compliance when education is mandatory; overall satisfaction with available education; strong support for interprofessional education; and lack of alignment or evaluation of engagement in education with population health outcomes. Areas of variation included: whether engagement in education is required as a condition to practice medicine; whether regulations are uniformly applied; if mechanisms to ensure independence existed; and physician perceptions of independence.

Results of this assessment maybe used by a variety of different stakeholders to assess how well country-level CME/CPD systems are meeting the needs of practicing physicians and determine what, if any, changes might need to be implemented to improve outcomes.

Funding

The assessments and publication were funded through an independent educational grant from Pfizer.

History

Usage metrics

    Medical Teacher

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC